Re: [AMBER-Developers] Tutorials

From: Hai Nguyen <nhai.qn.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:34:26 -0400

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:28 PM, David Cerutti <dscerutti.gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm very sorry to have wasted everyone's time with this. I will correct my
> tutorials.
>

I think it's good to have someone like you to play with layout/TOC ... to
make better website.

Hai


> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:20 PM, David Cerutti <dscerutti.gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It's not in the master. The constant pH demonstration is still in
> > there, I
> > > just moved it to a different section thinking it wasn't necessarily
> > > "accelerated MD." If I missed a tutorial it's very easy to add--there's
> > > just one line in the ToC per tutorial.
> > >
> >
> > ​I don't see the constant pH tutorials here:
> > http://casegroup.rutgers.edu/~cerutti/amber_web/tutorials/, and I've
> > looked
> > several times. And if we're encountering this much confusion discussing
> > this layout here (maybe there is at least some ToC under the top-level
> that
> > does refer to the CpHMD tutorial), I suspect it will be worse for users.
> >
> > I'm also with Dave -- the fewer clicks you need to get to where you're
> > going (i.e., fewer pages), the better, and the front page is
> uninteresting
> > and confusing as it stands now.
> > ​
> >
> > > If the numbering scheme is haphazard and confusing it is because I am
> > > retaining the numbering scheme that was already there. It may only
> look
> > > haphazard now that all of the tutorials can be browsed in groups.
> > >
> >
> > ​The numbering scheme should not be retained if you are fundamentally
> > changing how the tutorials are organized. It will only be confusing.
> You
> > should retain the same links (to keep old posts relevant), but that
> doesn't
> > mean you have to apply the A#/B# labels in the ToC.
> >
> > I like the current layout (everything on the same page with a ToC in the
> > header that links to the sections below in the page) better. It's easier
> > to navigate and easier to maintain as we add (and maybe remove)
> tutorials.​
> > I'm all for improving the ToC at the top of the page, but not really
> > splitting it across almost a dozen separate pages.
> >
> > All the best,
> > Jason
> >
> > --
> > Jason M. Swails
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER-Developers mailing list
> > AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Thu Sep 29 2016 - 12:00:02 PDT
Custom Search