I'm very sorry to have wasted everyone's time with this. I will correct my
tutorials.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:20 PM, David Cerutti <dscerutti.gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It's not in the master. The constant pH demonstration is still in
> there, I
> > just moved it to a different section thinking it wasn't necessarily
> > "accelerated MD." If I missed a tutorial it's very easy to add--there's
> > just one line in the ToC per tutorial.
> >
>
> I don't see the constant pH tutorials here:
> http://casegroup.rutgers.edu/~cerutti/amber_web/tutorials/, and I've
> looked
> several times. And if we're encountering this much confusion discussing
> this layout here (maybe there is at least some ToC under the top-level that
> does refer to the CpHMD tutorial), I suspect it will be worse for users.
>
> I'm also with Dave -- the fewer clicks you need to get to where you're
> going (i.e., fewer pages), the better, and the front page is uninteresting
> and confusing as it stands now.
>
>
> > If the numbering scheme is haphazard and confusing it is because I am
> > retaining the numbering scheme that was already there. It may only look
> > haphazard now that all of the tutorials can be browsed in groups.
> >
>
> The numbering scheme should not be retained if you are fundamentally
> changing how the tutorials are organized. It will only be confusing. You
> should retain the same links (to keep old posts relevant), but that doesn't
> mean you have to apply the A#/B# labels in the ToC.
>
> I like the current layout (everything on the same page with a ToC in the
> header that links to the sections below in the page) better. It's easier
> to navigate and easier to maintain as we add (and maybe remove) tutorials.
> I'm all for improving the ToC at the top of the page, but not really
> splitting it across almost a dozen separate pages.
>
> All the best,
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Thu Sep 29 2016 - 11:30:02 PDT
