Re: [AMBER-Developers] New Year fixes for Amber

From: Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 13:36:38 -0800

Agreed - I think people need to be more vocal on the developers list,
asking questions about who is working on what, what the status of
different things are etc.


On 1/6/14 1:04 PM, "Thomas Cheatham" <tec3.utah.edu> wrote:

>
>> The Monte Carlo barostat - both CPU and GPU.
>
>This sounds to me a lot like miscommunication in development which we
>should try to rectify at the AMBER meeting. It doesn't do well to have
>many groups independently working on the same problem, especially if the
>"fixes" are not in the tree. --tom
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER-Developers mailing list
>AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers



_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Mon Jan 06 2014 - 14:00:03 PST
Custom Search