Amber 13: The bugs have evolved. We don't need no intelligent designers.
;-)
On 4/19/13 2:45 PM, "Daniel Roe" <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
>wrote:
>> I guess I am a little confused here: I don't recall the concept of
>>"design"
>> ever being associated with Amber.
>
>"Amber 13: Great by accident, not by design."
>
>
>--
>-------------------------
>Daniel R. Roe, PhD
>Department of Medicinal Chemistry
>University of Utah
>30 South 2000 East, Room 201
>Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
>http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
>(801) 587-9652
>(801) 585-9119 (Fax)
>
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER-Developers mailing list
>AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Apr 19 2013 - 15:30:04 PDT
