On Fri, Apr 13, 2012, Ross Walker wrote:
>
> Here's another bugfix to roll in with the AMBER 12 bugfix you are making.
> This mirrors bugfix.22 for AMBER 11.
>
> commit 6716d9da716889cc0d81913329b0006555a8b53c
> Author: Ross Walker <rcw.sdsc.edu>
> Date: Fri Apr 13 15:03:33 2012 -0700
>
> Fixes issue where certain broken Linux implementations never flush
> their
> buffers to disk unless a file is closed regardless of how much time
> has elapsed. This manifested itself in restart files that would always
> appear to be truncated unless the job ran to completion.
I think this should be a separate bugfix: it's not related to anything
about Amber11 -> Amber12, etc. If we do decide on a massive Amber11 ->
Amber12 bugfix, I certainly want to hold off on that until we are sure that we
have caught everything.
For all developers:
I have temporarily moved Dan's cpptraj/ptraj bugfix out of the way on the
live web-site until we can work out the proper vetting procedure for bugfixes.
Please don't add any more new bugfixes to the amber web git repo until we have
a chance to figure out the general procedure for handling these.
...thanks....dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Apr 13 2012 - 19:00:03 PDT
