Re: [AMBER-Developers] Another AMBER 12 bugfix

From: case <>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:30:17 -0400

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012, Ross Walker wrote:

> Here's another bugfix to roll in with the AMBER 12 bugfix you are making.
> This mirrors bugfix.22 for AMBER 11.
> commit 6716d9da716889cc0d81913329b0006555a8b53c
> Author: Ross Walker <>
> Date: Fri Apr 13 15:03:33 2012 -0700
> Fixes issue where certain broken Linux implementations never flush
> their
> buffers to disk unless a file is closed regardless of how much time
> has elapsed. This manifested itself in restart files that would always
> appear to be truncated unless the job ran to completion.

I think this should be a separate bugfix: it's not related to anything
about Amber11 -> Amber12, etc. If we do decide on a massive Amber11 ->
Amber12 bugfix, I certainly want to hold off on that until we are sure that we
have caught everything.

For all developers:

I have temporarily moved Dan's cpptraj/ptraj bugfix out of the way on the
live web-site until we can work out the proper vetting procedure for bugfixes.
Please don't add any more new bugfixes to the amber web git repo until we have
a chance to figure out the general procedure for handling these.


AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Fri Apr 13 2012 - 19:00:03 PDT
Custom Search