[AMBER-Developers] [Anselm.Horn.biochem.uni-erlangen.de: Amber12 - Version string]

From: David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:49:29 -0400

Anybody want to look at this?...dac

----- Forwarded message from Anselm Horn <Anselm.Horn.biochem.uni-erlangen.de> -----

Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:34:23 +0200
From: Anselm Horn <Anselm.Horn.biochem.uni-erlangen.de>
To: David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Amber12 - Version string

Dear Prof. Case,

I recently downloaded the new Amber12 release and am very eager to try
out new features.

However, I noticed, that the version string of some Amber / AmberTools
modules still holds "11" instead of "12", e.g.:

   #define PTRAJ_VERSION_STRING "\"AMBER 11.0 integrated\" (4/2010)"

   write(6, '(a)') ' Running multisander version of sander Amber11'

   write(mdout, '(a, /)') '| PMEMD implementation of SANDER, Release 11'

Although I know, that you worked hard on the release of Amber12 and most
probably had to deal with lots of administrative stuff,
I kindly ask you to update the version information using a bugfix: for
the user it is easier to see which version of executable was used for
the respective calculation/computation.

Many thanks in advance!

Best regards,

Anselm Horn

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

----- End forwarded message -----

David A. Case                     | case.biomaps.rutgers.edu   
BioMaPS Institute and Dept. of    |                             
    Chemistry & Chemical Biology  |    fax:      +1-732-445-4320
Rutgers University                |    office:   +1-848-445-5885
174 Frelinghuysen Road, Rm. 208b  |    cell:     +1-609-651-6817
Piscataway, NJ 08854        USA   | http://casegroup.rutgers.edu
AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Fri Apr 13 2012 - 07:00:06 PDT
Custom Search