Re: [AMBER-Developers] Third (final?) release candidate for Amber 12

From: tluchko <>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:35:20 -0400

On 03/29/2012 11:28 PM, David A Case wrote:
> I have placed updated tarballs here:

I've posted tests on CentOS 5.7 for GNU, Intel and PGI compilers. To

1) The majority of failures are differences in the last digit and are
likely just round-off errors. I.e., these should really pass. These
false positives would go away if we doubled the error tolerance. E.g.,
   dacdif -r 1e-6
   dacdif -r 2e-6
This should let round-offs through but catch everything else.

2) rem_hybrid has problems with three threads.

3) the fibre-diffraction module has problems with 10 threads when built
with GNU and PGI.

4) MMPBSA_PY fails with PGI on two threads.


AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Mon Apr 02 2012 - 10:00:07 PDT
Custom Search