Re: [AMBER-Developers] Third (final?) release candidate for Amber 12

From: Wu, Xiongwu (NIH/NHLBI) [E] <"Wu,>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 22:23:48 -0400

Here is another similar error related to "parse" at AmberTools/src/semantics:

make[3]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Users/Xiongwu/programs/home/Xiongwu/ambers/amber12/AmberTools/src/semantics'
gcc -DDATDIR='"/cygdrive/c/Users/Xiongwu/programs/home/Xiongwu/ambers/amber12/dat"' -DCYGWIN -DBINTRAJ \
          -o parse.exe parse.c
./parse *.rules
/bin/sh: ./parse: cannot execute binary file
Makefile:46: recipe for target `checkexpr.c' failed
make[3]: *** [checkexpr.c] Error 126

This error can also be fixed by running:
./parse.exe *.rules

Other than this the installation can be completed with CYGWIN.

A make test.serials stopped at :

  ./Run.mmpbsa.test: Program error
Makefile:890: recipe for target `test.mm_pbsa' failed
make: *** [test.mm_pbsa] Error 1

From: case []
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 7:42 PM
To: AMBER Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] Third (final?) release candidate for Amber 12

On Sun, Apr 01, 2012, Wu, Xiongwu (NIH/NHLBI) [E] wrote:

> [WXW%] I used windows 7 for this test installation
> > Does the following work "./utilMakeHelp.exe helptext.text helptext.c" ?
> >
> [WXW%] Yes, this works. Looks like the installation uses "utilMakeHelp" coming with the release to do the compilation.

> Should we change the configure file?

I'm not sure how utilMakeHelp made it into the is not supposed
to be there, and I don't think it has ever been in any other tarball. I've
updated the Makefile to help prevent this from happening again.


AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Sun Apr 01 2012 - 19:30:03 PDT
Custom Search