On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, Xingping Liu wrote:
>
> There is no specific reason for using dsvdc() instead of dgesvd().
> Maybe we should just set isvd to 2 to save the energy to look into the
> library subroutines.
Can you say which test case(s) you are talking about? Hopefully provide a
patch (I guess with new outputs) that implements the proposed change?
...thanks!...dave
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Mar 28 2012 - 08:00:03 PDT
