Re: [AMBER-Developers] ntb vs ifbox?

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:37:35 -0500

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Yong Duan <duan.ucdavis.edu> wrote:

>
> Ah, so, it works if it was simulated/constructed as ifbox>0.
>
> So the scenario is:
>
> 1) construct a PBC system with IFBOX>0.
> 2) simulate with NTB=0
> 3) Then, simulation with NTB=1.
>
> You could have said this earlier.
>

I tried, just unsuccessfully :). What do you think about my suggestion as
far as providing a "smart" default while still maintaining the same
behavior if users supply an explicit ntb value?

What about other people?

All the best,
Jason

-- 
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Dec 06 2011 - 17:00:03 PST
Custom Search