Re: [AMBER-Developers] AMBER11 bugfix #19 is broken

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:41:14 -0500

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:50 PM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011, Jason Swails wrote:
> >
> > I could just make it another branch, but the way I have it, it's a whole
> > new repository (hence my line of thinking). Should I just make it a new
> > branch to the repo?
>
> Go ahead and to whatever seems best and/or easiest; I don't see that it's
> a big deal one way or the other. Or, you could just to nothing, and
> decide when/if someone wants access to it.
>

I think I'll choose the nothing direction for now :). If this becomes a
necessity, I'll push it in as either a new repository (easiest for me) or
as a new branch to amber.git (probably a little more intuitive for
everybody else).

Thanks!
Jason

-- 
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Thu Nov 24 2011 - 08:00:05 PST
Custom Search