Re: [AMBER-Developers] significant recent tleap changes

From: Yong Duan <duan.ucdavis.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:16:20 -0800

Can you send the older version code to me? Or, perhaps in the released
AMBER 11 tree?

OK, I stop checking the codes. Sorry! My bad.

yong

On 11/11/11 3:55 PM, "Ross Walker" <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:

>Hi Yong,
>
>> Improper 1-4's are never used, either in sander or in pmemd. I am not
>> sure
>> in other programs, hopefully consistent. Putting 0's is fine. I can
>> update
>> that.
>
>What you mean is 1-4 impropers do not feature in the code that calculates
>1-4 VDW and EEL I assume? - Certainly they are used in the dihedral code.
>
>Note the 0's should NOT just be there for the impropers. They should be
>there for ALL additional dihedrals. This is a safety check. The code
>should
>only calculate a 1-4VDW / EEL for the first dihedral in a set it gets to.
>Having the additional dihedrals have scaling factors of 0 means if someone
>messes with things, and puts dihedrals out of order, messes up the section
>that labels unique dihedrals etc then you get infinity and the code
>crashes
>rather than just silently producing junk.
>
>Thus I would make sure things match properly here with older code.
>
>> Besides these "failures", you will also see CMAP-related failures. Both
>> sander and pmemd can take CMAP without CHARMM option.
>
>Why have all the test cases not been updated along with the checkin???
>
>> This means the test suite needs to be updated and that the "new" test
>> suite will cause a lot of "failures" to the old code and vice versa.
>
>I always assume updating the test cases (not just replacing the saved
>output
>but replacing them with results you know to be correct and have carefully
>tested by hand) is a key part of checking in updated code. If you don't
>include test cases and updated test cases with your code checkins then the
>code should NOT be being checked in.
>
>Note, once I have cruise control up and running properly running all the
>test cases on a regular basis if you check something in that breaks the
>test
>you will be getting regular emails from the git server politely informing
>you of your 'mistake'.
>
>All the best
>Ross
>
>
>/\
>\/
>|\oss Walker
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>| Assistant Research Professor |
>| San Diego Supercomputer Center |
>| Adjunct Assistant Professor |
>| Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry |
>| University of California San Diego |
>| NVIDIA Fellow |
>| http://www.rosswalker.co.uk | http://www.wmd-lab.org/ |
>| Tel: +1 858 822 0854 | EMail:- ross.rosswalker.co.uk |
>---------------------------------------------------------
>
>Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may not
>be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER-Developers mailing list
>AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers



_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Nov 11 2011 - 19:30:03 PST
Custom Search