On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:28 PM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> I'm happy to see so much interest and passion about how to make Amber
> better,
> but we need some ground rules, before productive discussions become
> flame wars:
>
> 1. Please don't post things that can be construed as attacks of other
> developers. Go out of your way to be polite, and edit your posts (before
> hitting "send") with this in mind.
>
Wise advice. I didn't come off the way I was aiming for in my
overly-redundant posts (I hope to become as accomplished as Tom at avoiding
flame wars someday :).
> 2. Keep your posts short and on-topic.
I'll list this as one of my strengths on my CV
> It helps to see the gist of
> ideas for making things better, but at this stage the details of the
> implementation can be a distraction. If you really need a lot of space,
> use an attachment to hold the details.
Which I'll include as an attachment.
All the best (I really need to find a different sign-off),
Jason
--
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Nov 04 2011 - 23:30:03 PDT
