On Wed, Oct 26, 2011, Duke, Robert E Jr wrote:
> Well, do bear in mind the conditions under which the code was written:
> 1) mandate to absolutely maximize performance, and 2) good branch
> prediction was not uniformly available across all cpu's in use.
Understood -- I'm not trying to complain here -- everyone agrees that the
pmemd code is nicely done, and easier to read and modify (in spite of the
#ifdef's) than sander. And, I'm the kettle calling the pot black, since a
good fraction of the mess in sander is my fault.
But we should still clean up things as much as makes sense.
....dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Oct 26 2011 - 13:00:03 PDT
