Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:34:04AM -0600, Jason Swails wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Scott Brozell <sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu>wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 09:58:45PM +0000, B. Lachele Foley wrote:
> > > I am working on adding to this page: http://ambermd.org/ubuntu.html
> >
> > I thought that i had worked on that page, but
> > there are only 2 log entries and I didnt do either.
> >
> > > The page says that earlier versions of amber needed bison or byacc. I
> > got an install to go pretty well without any such (Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS --
> > Lucid Lynx outfitted to be an LTSP server).
> > >
> > > Does that give anyone reason for concern? The test results are below.
> > Details upon request.
> > >
> >
> > Probably not. grepping the Makefiles shows that a yacc is used.
> > But in configure there is
> > YACC= \$(BINDIR)/yacc
> >
> > There are no useful comments in the logs on yacc.
>
> bison was at one point necessary for Amber on Ubuntu. There was a line that
> bison would interpret correctly, but the amber-provided yacc would not. It
> was actually you (Scott) that caught the cause of this issue, and Dave that
> checked in the fix (back in the CVS days from the look of the message log).
^^^^^^^^^^^
Jason, what log exactly are you viewing and how did you get that log ?
When i did a git log of amber_web/ubuntu.html i got:
----
commit 505e9de6cbe5258e34102278d62d39ee6cd47782
Author: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Wed Jan 5 11:35:45 2011 -0500
Update Ubuntu instructions -- bz2 and libbz2 must be installed from
aptitude for cpptraj to work fully, so I added this to the list of
packages that should be installed.
commit fa453eb884ff8403171e099b9457de606d57e6d3
Author: David A. Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Thu May 13 22:05:47 2010 -0400
initial repo on 5/13/10
----
As you can see there is no mention of bison/yacc...
I really miss being able to read old (cvs) logs.
I put a lot of clues in my logs so that i could remember what i did
and why. There have always been too many bosses/projects/programs
to keep that in my head.
thanks,
scott
> Here's the thread: http://dev-archive.ambermd.org/201003/0185.html . (I
> actually remembered this thread...)
>
> Not sure what this information serves.
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Jul 26 2011 - 23:30:02 PDT
