Re: [AMBER-Developers] Compilation of AMBER Tools

From: David A. Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:21:05 -0400

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011, Jason Swails wrote:
>
> I can see the PGI compilers complaining here, except maybe the newest
> versions... I also don't think we should drop PGI support, since they're
> fairly prominent and high-performance commercial compilers...

OK; I am convinced that we should continue to support gcc 4.1.2 and similar,
although as far as I know, no one knows how to fix the ncsu problem.

I believe that Taisung has (or will) convert allocatable arrays to pointers,
which should be tested. But we do need people who still have RedHat servers
to continue to test with the older compilers.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Jun 10 2011 - 03:30:06 PDT
Custom Search