Re: [AMBER-Developers] Second release candidate for AmberTools 1.5

From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:43:51 -0400

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011, Jason Swails wrote:
>
> It doesn't seem like there's really any way around this. What do people
> think about letting Python just use GCC if it can find it in case someone
> chooses pgi at configure time?

Sounds fine to me. At one time (maybe still?) sleap used g++ no matter what
compiler was requested for configure. So there is precedence.

...dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Mar 15 2011 - 18:00:02 PDT
Custom Search