On Nov 27, 2010, at 5:14 AM, case wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010, Scott Brozell wrote:
>>
>> The newly created file qmmm_struct_module.f uses F2003 syntax:
>> gfortran -c -O3 -ffree-form -o qmmm_struct_module.o _qmmm_struct_module.f
>> _qmmm_struct_module.f:337.20:
>> integer, pointer, intent(inout) :: iarr(:)
>> 1
>> Error: POINTER attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute at (1)
>
> Plus, an explicit "intent" attribute here doesn't really add anything. I'd
> like to keep the list of compilers that are OK for Amber as large as we can.
>
> ....dac
I changed this to valid F95 by removing the INTENT attribute.
Should we avoid all F2003 language extensions (but use F2003 intrinsic functions/subroutines as suggested in the coding guidelines)? This would be easy by letting the compiler check if the code adheres to the standard.
All the best,
Andy
--
Dr. Andreas W. Goetz
San Diego Supercomputer Center
Tel : +1-858-822-4771
Email: agoetz.sdsc.edu
Web : www.awgoetz.de
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sun Nov 28 2010 - 00:30:03 PST
