On Mon, Apr 19, 2010, MengJuei Hsieh wrote:
>
> I conclude that it's not possible to allocate that much memory in cygwin, so
> I suggest we could probably change the "arcres" values in mmpbsa_py and
> mm_pbsa from the default 1/16 to a coarser 1/8. But the question is, can we
> still modify the programs/test cases at this point?
I think it is better for cygwin users to understand that mmpbsa calculations
may/will fail for lack of memory, than to twiddle up the test cases to make
everything "look good". I would really like to discourage people from
thinking that cygwin is a good platform for Amber.
>
> Although we don't encourage the use of "maxarcdot", I do have to add an
> extra checking to avoid out of boundary access of those array. Here I
> attached the patch.
Is this related to the test case? Or is it a general safety patch?
....thx...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Apr 20 2010 - 01:00:02 PDT
