Re: [AMBER-Developers] final (!?!) release candidate for Amber11

From: Ben Roberts <roberts.qtp.ufl.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:51:43 -0400

On 16/4/2010, at 11:28 a.m., Ben Roberts wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> On my Mac (Snow Leopard 10.6.2, Intel compilers 11.1.084), I get this now:
>

Following on from my earlier email, with the Amber serial test, I get:

     421 file comparisons passed
       2 file comparisons failed
       0 tests experienced errors

[roberts.qtpclnt070 test]$ less logs/test_amber_serial/2010-04-16_14-20-49.diff
possible FAILURE: check mdout.pbsa_decpw.dif
/Applications/Amber11/2010-04-14/amber11/test/sander_pbsa_decpw
4236c4236
< Norm of the residual vector: 7.8405479187964859
> Norm of the residual vector: 7.83810820247087
4237c4237
< Convergence achieved : 9.80389426882965305E-4
> Convergence achieved : 9.800843624773914E-4
4318c4318
< Norm of the residual vector: 6.2891993383991771
> Norm of the residual vector: 6.28897166246199
4319c4319
< Convergence achieved : 9.20650094614757614E-4
> Convergence achieved : 9.206167660681756E-4
### Maximum absolute error in matching lines = 2.44e-03 at line 4236 field 6
### Maximum relative error in matching lines = 3.11e-04 at line 4236 field 6

Again, this seems to be precision-related?

---------------------------------------
possible FAILURE: check mdout.tip5p.dif
/Applications/Amber11/2010-04-14/amber11/test/tip5p
259,260d258
< EKCMT = 0.237 VIRIAL = 15.560 VOLUME = 0.000
< Density = 0.
---------------------------------------

The TIP5P error, discussed previously. Nothing to see here, I guess...


_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Apr 16 2010 - 15:00:03 PDT
Custom Search