Re: [AMBER-Developers] final (!?!) release candidate for Amber11

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:02:15 -0400

Hello,

Is the following common for trying AmberTools parallel with
DO_PARALLEL="mpirun -np 4" ?


Finished test suite for parallel AmberTools (ptraj) at Thu Apr 15
14:00:08 EDT 2010.


Finished test suite for AmberTools at Thu Apr 15 14:00:08 EDT 2010.

make: Target `test.parallel2' not remade because of errors.
13 file comparisons passed
15 file comparisons failed
5 tests experienced errors

All the best,
Jason


On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:39 AM, <steinbrt.rci.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> here (fedora11, x86_64 (Intel Quadcore 2.66GHz), intel compiler suite
> 11.1.059, with openmpi-1.4.1) both AT alone and with A11 compile fine. The
> only test failures I see are:
>
> tip5p (both serial/parallel) in amber
> the rism1d path typo in AT (already noted by Jason).
>
> I noticed that the ti_decomp_sc test case is still uncommented, but it
> passes for me now.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> Dr. Thomas Steinbrecher
> BioMaps Institute
> Rutgers University
> 610 Taylor Rd.
> Piscataway, NJ 08854
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>



-- 
---------------------------------------
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Thu Apr 15 2010 - 11:30:02 PDT
Custom Search