On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:22 AM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010, Adrian Roitberg wrote:
>>
>> 1. It would make it impossible to reproduce data exactly (let's say for
>> debugging) unless the user sets him/herself the seed by hand.
>
> The program prints out what value of ig is chosen, so one can use that
> value as input for a re-run to get the same set of random numbers.
> So, one does not have to know in advance that a re-run might be desirable;
> it's always possible just by copying the seed in the old output file to the
> new input file.
>
>>
>> 2. The test cases MUST have a seed set by hand, otherwise they would
>> never pass.
>
> I think this is killer for right now, since there are hundreds of tests that
> would be need to be updated.
Many tests have their own ig... If there's any interest i can compile
a list of those that don't...
>
> .....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
--
---------------------------------------
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Apr 13 2010 - 09:00:03 PDT
