Which went bust in May last year.
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2009/05/29/sicortex_to_cl
ose_operations/
I guess the contract on the webserver was probably paid for a few years in
advance.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amber-developers-bounces.ambermd.org [mailto:amber-developers-
> bounces.ambermd.org] On Behalf Of Thorsten M Woelfle
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 11:02 AM
> To: AMBER Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] PMEMD missing type?
>
> Bought by a company called SiCortex in summer 2007 ...
>
> http://insidehpc.com/2007/08/02/pathscale-compiler-moves-to-sicortex/
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Robert Duke wrote:
>
> > So, just out of curiosity, does anyone know what is happening with
> PathScale? I thought they had maybe died, but I can still find a
> webpage. Two or three years ago, they were pretty close on performance,
> with a significant difference (positive) in usability. I had always
> figured intel would have an edge because they make the chips and have
> pretty deep pockets, but their usability factor has been just awful for
> some time now. When I first advocated using them (I think it was at
> least partially my fault, though these days there are not a lot of
> other options anyway), things were not nearly this bad, except perhaps
> for Itanium...
> > Best Regards - Bob
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Walker"
> <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
> > To: "'AMBER Developers Mailing List'" <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:47 PM
> > Subject: RE: [AMBER-Developers] PMEMD missing type?
> >
> >
> >> 10.1.018 also works.
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: amber-developers-bounces.ambermd.org [mailto:amber-
> developers-
> >>> bounces.ambermd.org] On Behalf Of case
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:03 AM
> >>> To: AMBER Developers Mailing List
> >>> Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] PMEMD missing type?
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010, case wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > cpp -traditional -P -DBINTRAJ -DDIRFRC_EFS -
> DDIRFRC_COMTRANS
> >>> > > > -DDIRFRC_NOVEC -DFFTLOADBAL_2PROC -DPUBFFT pme_setup.fpp
> >>> pme_setup.f90
> >>> > > > ifort -fast -c pme_setup.f90
> >>> > > > pme_setup.f90(417): error #6404: This name does not have a
> type,
> >>> and
> >>> > > > must
> >>> > > > have an explicit type. [NATOM]
> >>> > > > do n = 1, natom
> >>> > > > ------------^
> >>> > > >
> >>> >
> >>> > What Intel compiler are you using?
> >>>
> >>> One quick addtional point, then I have meetings all day:
> >>>
> >>> For me, it appears that ifort 10.1.025 works, but 11.1.069 fails.
> >>>
> >>> ...dac
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> >>> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> >>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> >> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER-Developers mailing list
> > AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Mar 09 2010 - 12:00:02 PST
