Bought by a company called SiCortex in summer 2007 ...
http://insidehpc.com/2007/08/02/pathscale-compiler-moves-to-sicortex/
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Robert Duke wrote:
> So, just out of curiosity, does anyone know what is happening with PathScale? I thought they had maybe died, but I can still find a webpage. Two or three years ago, they were pretty close on performance, with a significant difference (positive) in usability. I had always figured intel would have an edge because they make the chips and have pretty deep pockets, but their usability factor has been just awful for some time now. When I first advocated using them (I think it was at least partially my fault, though these days there are not a lot of other options anyway), things were not nearly this bad, except perhaps for Itanium...
> Best Regards - Bob
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Walker" <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
> To: "'AMBER Developers Mailing List'" <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:47 PM
> Subject: RE: [AMBER-Developers] PMEMD missing type?
>
>
>> 10.1.018 also works.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: amber-developers-bounces.ambermd.org [mailto:amber-developers-
>>> bounces.ambermd.org] On Behalf Of case
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:03 AM
>>> To: AMBER Developers Mailing List
>>> Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] PMEMD missing type?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010, case wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > cpp -traditional -P -DBINTRAJ -DDIRFRC_EFS -DDIRFRC_COMTRANS
>>> > > > -DDIRFRC_NOVEC -DFFTLOADBAL_2PROC -DPUBFFT pme_setup.fpp
>>> pme_setup.f90
>>> > > > ifort -fast -c pme_setup.f90
>>> > > > pme_setup.f90(417): error #6404: This name does not have a type,
>>> and
>>> > > > must
>>> > > > have an explicit type. [NATOM]
>>> > > > do n = 1, natom
>>> > > > ------------^
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>> > What Intel compiler are you using?
>>>
>>> One quick addtional point, then I have meetings all day:
>>>
>>> For me, it appears that ifort 10.1.025 works, but 11.1.069 fails.
>>>
>>> ...dac
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AMBER-Developers mailing list
>>> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER-Developers mailing list
>> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Mar 09 2010 - 11:30:08 PST
