Errr, that is what I suggested I believe when Dave put out his little RFC on
building amber and ambertools...
- Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Walker" <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
To: "'AMBER Developers Mailing List'" <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:46 PM
Subject: [AMBER-Developers] Makefile suggestions for AMBER and AMBER Tools
> Hi All,
>
> I am still grappling with trying to merge pmemd into the makefiles and
> coming across all sorts of issues with building amber tools etc. One thing
> I
> wanted to canvas opinion on though was combining AMBER and AMBERTools
> building. One idea I thought would be to have a single master makefile
> that
> has various rules to call Makefile_at and a new Makefile_amber
>
> That way if someone just has AMBERTools they would use Makefile_at but if
> they had AMBER and AMBERTools they would use the default Makefile which
> would automatically build AMBER and AMBERTools for them along with the
> dependencies. The AMBER makefile instructions would be in Makefile_amber
> and
> the main master Makefile in src/ would essentially be a wrapper for these
> two Makefiles.
>
> Comments?
>
> All the best
> Ross
>
> /\
> \/
> |\oss Walker
>
> | Assistant Research Professor |
> | San Diego Supercomputer Center |
> | Tel: +1 858 822 0854 | EMail:- ross.rosswalker.co.uk |
> | http://www.rosswalker.co.uk | http://www.wmd-lab.org/ |
>
> Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may not
> be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Mar 03 2010 - 19:00:05 PST
