Re: [AMBER-Developers] Build of AmberTools failed in libnab.a

From: MengJuei Hsieh <mengjueh.uci.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:54:53 -0800

Hi,

It turns out be some weirdness of nab (not sure), but moving libsym to the
last of the rule seems to work with make -jx (x>1)....

Check out current src/nss/Makefile to see if that works for you guys...

Best,
-- 
Mengjuei Hsieh, Molecular Biology & Biochem, Univ. of California Irvine.
> From: MengJuei Hsieh <mengjueh.uci.edu>
> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:04:18 -0800
> To: AMBER Developers Mailing List <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
> 
> This is more likely pointing to a direction that we might need to check the
> dependency. It might not be explicit enough for "make" to wait for the
> required object files to be compiled. Let me check later to see if I can play
> with nab's Makefile.
> 
>> From: Ben Roberts <roberts.qtp.ufl.edu>
>> Reply-To: AMBER Developers Mailing List <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
>> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:47:52 -0500
>> To: AMBER Developers Mailing List <amber-developers.ambermd.org>
>> Subject: [AMBER-Developers] Build of AmberTools failed in libnab.a
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Following Ross' advice this afternoon, I tried building Makefile_at
>> with -j8 (8-core Mac Pro).
>> make: *** [serial] Error 2
>> 
>> A rather ugly error, indeed. I can't quite translate "archive member
>> with length 0 is not mach-o or bitcode" into English. Can anyone
>> advise as to what might have happened here?
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Mar 02 2010 - 19:00:04 PST
Custom Search