Hi Scott,
I got bogged down working on other things for a bit. Rest assured that,
as far as Amber development goes, it's next on my To Do list.
I suspect it's still broken, unless someone has played around with that
code since I last checked.
Ben
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 00:33 -0500, Scott Brozell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the status on this ?
>
> Scott
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:19:41PM -0500, Ben Roberts wrote:
> > Thanks Jason. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately, since at least it's
> > within our power to fix), removing MKL doesn't help in this instance. At
> > least it's one less source of complexity.
> >
> > Incidentally, I turned on some verbose warning options for icc and
> > ifort. I'll begin by trawling through those logs and seeing if anything
> > looks relevant. I did get a lot of warnings, but I'm not sure how
> > serious any of them are.
> >
> > Jason Swails wrote:
> > >Did you try it without the MKL? Perhaps there's a memory allocation
> > >bug in the intel MKL... Although this might be wrong if DFTB doesn't
> > >use any MKL subroutines.
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sat Feb 06 2010 - 07:00:03 PST
