Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:05:01PM -0500, case wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009, Lachele Foley wrote:
> >
> > So, invoking "csh -f" on my system causes /bin/rm to behave unexpectedly
> > (plain csh works as expected).
>
> This is indeed odd, but some similar-sounding problems have been reported
> before. What does "/bin/csh --version" report?
I only found reports of requiring an csh in am-dev.
> There are lots of test cases that begin with "#!/bin/csh -f" and later contain
> a "/bin/rm -f ..." command. Maybe it has something to do with shell
> globbing(?). [Most other /bin/rm commands don't use shell wild-cards.]
>
> Your report is a little incomplete: what is the "trouble" that is caused
> in the Run.tleap script? Also, what you show about the behavior of csh vs.
> csh -f looks like what I would expect -- am I missing something there?
Yes, send verbose and verbatim details if u can reproduce the problem.
Scott
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Nov 25 2009 - 13:30:03 PST
