Re: [AMBER-Developers] new release candidate for AmberTools

From: case <>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:44:38 -0500

On Mon, Nov 09, 2009, Scott Brozell wrote:
> This is bug 93. Im thinking of a workaround in the lex files.
> I have to refresh my memory on lex. Further details will be in bug 93.

I'm not sure this can be fixed by changing the lex files. My idea is to do
what we did with leap: remove the rules that create lex.mm_options.c, and
just have that file (made with flex) be a part of the distribution. The lex
file can still be around for future developers, but users don't need to deal
with it.

Scott or Russ: can you see if the lex.mm_options.c and lex.dg_options.c files
(in /amber11/src/nab/lexc) will work on Solaris?


AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Tue Nov 10 2009 - 05:00:05 PST
Custom Search