Hi,
This is bug 93. Im thinking of a workaround in the lex files.
I have to refresh my memory on lex. Further details will be in bug 93.
Scott
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 06:01:55PM -0800, Russ.Brown.Sun.COM wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> Under Solaris, the lex commands that create lex.mm_options.c and
> lex.dg_options.c still appear not to work.
>
> Russ
>
> On 10/30/09 07:32, case wrote:
> >Hi everyone:
> >
> >Here is the latest tarball for AmberTools:
> >
> > http://ambermd.org/downloads/AmberTools30oct09.tar.bz2
> >
> >I'm posting this not so much as a "release candidate" than as an aid for
> >people having problems: you can/should use this as your test suite; the
> >07oct09 version is still at the above location, in case you want to see if
> >recent changes have affected your results.
> >
> >For what it is worth: the tarball above looks fine to me on MacOSX 10.5
> >with
> >gcc 4.4: small diffs in a few am1-bcc charges, some reduce "failures" that
> >have to do with formatting of 80-character lines, and one other tiny
> >roundoff
> >error.
> >
> >Also: there have been a lot of changes to the AmberTools.pdf file, but lots
> >of proofreading and updating is still needed. I'd really appreciate it if
> >people would look at things there, and update as needed. Amber PI's:
> >please
> >check the "authorship" page, as well as
> >http://ambermd.org/contributors.html.
> >
> >...thx!....dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Mon Nov 09 2009 - 21:00:02 PST
