Re: [AMBER-Developers] Second release candidate for AmberTools 1.3

From: Scott Brozell <sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:09:30 -0400

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 07:18:29PM -0400, Volodymyr Babin wrote:
>
> > Thanks for all your efforts on the numvec issue.
> > But it still doesnt work:
> > pgCC -c -I../../freelib -I../../freelib -o numvec.o numvec.cpp
> > "../../freelib/boost/numeric/ublas/detail/config.hpp", line 172:
> > catastrophic error:
> > #error directive: Your compiler is unsupported by this verions
> > of
> > uBLAS. Boost 1.32.0 includes uBLAS with support for many old
> > compilers.
>
> indeed ... OTOH, IMHO, uBLAS is better than valarray using
> private apis. OTOH2: does this error message suggest that the
> uBLAS was not used earlier? OTOH3: would anyone use PGI for
> sleap? [i.e., does it make sense to make it ublas-free].

To answer your questions: It would seem so. Maybe.
Since you and Wei did the work here, I never did read the code.
IMO (what no H -;-), if you two agree that the code is better then
lets leave it. I'll test pgi 9.0.4 and report to pgi if necessary.

thanks,
Scott


_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Mon Oct 12 2009 - 20:30:02 PDT
Custom Search