Hi,
thanks for the info, I havent seen this particular error before. Any ideas
on why it occurs in parallel but not serial compile? What would be a good
way to prevent this from happening to users that want to compile without
making changes to the various Makefiles?
Kind Regards,
Thomas
On Tue, September 15, 2009 10:52 am, Volodymyr Babin wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> the parallel sander failure does not look unexpected to me: f2c.a
> contains intrinsic fortran routines; same routines may reside in
> some sort of library that it is a part of a fortran compiler (to
> link with in case they are not inlined by the fortran compiler); it
> is thus very normal to expect all sorts of conflicts if one passes
> f2c.a to the fortran linker (depending on the number of underscores
> used in f2c.a vs the fortran library, etc).
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> Volodymyr
>
> On Tue, September 15, 2009 10:24, steinbrt.rci.rutgers.edu wrote:
>> Regarding the sander failure,
>>
>> taking i_dnnt out of the f2c Makefile allows a successful compile of
>> sander.MPI, which passes the test.parallel.
>>
>> Is this some problem with my peculiar system? Has anybody else
>> experienced
>> this trouble with newish Intel compilers?
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> Dr. Thomas Steinbrecher
>> BioMaps Institute
>> Rutgers University
>> 610 Taylor Rd.
>> Piscataway, NJ 08854
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER-Developers mailing list
>> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
Dr. Thomas Steinbrecher
BioMaps Institute
Rutgers University
610 Taylor Rd.
Piscataway, NJ 08854
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Sep 15 2009 - 08:30:02 PDT
