On Fri, Dec 12, 2008, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
>
> Until Amber9, back when Amber and AmberTools were still together, the
> citation for Amber and AmberTools was the same, and in the manual. Now
> that there are two separate manuals, and AmberTools can be aquired
> separately, the AmberTools manual does not show a recommended citation
> for the AT programs. I assume it is still the same as Amber?
Developers should chime in here -- Do we just want to have individual
citations for the parts of AmberTools (NAB, LEaP/gleap, antechamber, ptraj)?
Or should we bundle everyone's name together in a single citation?
...thx...dac
Received on Wed Dec 17 2008 - 01:08:59 PST
