Hi everyone,
my vote would also be to get rid of html, it doesnt help with
anything and true amber users should get used to doing everything in
ASCII anyway ;-)
Regards,
Thomas
Dr. Thomas Steinbrecher
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.
San Diego CA 92037, USA
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Carlos Simmerling wrote:
> I can't remember the last time that html helped in
> one of the emails. sometimes attachments are useful,
> so we probably should not block those.
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:38 PM, David A. Case <case.scripps.edu> wrote:
>> Ross Walker wrote:
>>
>>
>> > The best solution in the end though would be to stop accepting html email
>> > on the amber list. This would make things so much nicer but will obviously
>> > generate a lot of initial complaints from "inexperienced" users.
>>
>> What do people think about this idea? Many mailing lists do automatically
>> reject mail with html extensions. I've tried to be as "friendly" as possible
>> for amber.scripps.edu, but there is some price.
>>
>> So, I'm looking for advice or discussion: what do you think about the pros and
>> cons of forcing posts to be text only?
>>
>> ...thanks...dave
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ===================================================================
> Carlos L. Simmerling, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor Phone: (631) 632-1336
> Center for Structural Biology Fax: (631) 632-1555
> CMM Bldg, Room G80
> Stony Brook University E-mail: carlos.simmerling.gmail.com
> Stony Brook, NY 11794-5115 Web: http://comp.chem.sunysb.edu
> ===================================================================
>
Received on Sun May 04 2008 - 06:07:45 PDT
