On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Volodymyr Babin wrote:
>
> thank you. But what about bug fixes? For instance, I have
> just "cvs update -d"-ed my amber10 tree and compiled it with
> 'ifort -C -traceback'.
I guess we were remiss in not running the "-C" tests!
> forrtl: severe (408): fort: (3): Subscript #1 of the array NAME has value
> 0 which is less than the lower bound of 1
fixed (I think) in CVS.
Right now, I can update the tar file, since it has not yet been shipped to
anyone. Later, see the bug fixes page at
http://ambermd.org for information
on how bugfixes are handled.
...thanks...dac
Received on Fri Apr 18 2008 - 21:19:52 PDT
