Re: amber-developers: latest tarballs for AmberTools and Amber10

From: Scott Brozell <>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:03:38 -0800 (PST)


On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Lachele Foley wrote:

> Do sander & pmemd need more of the amber source tree than the executables to run? I don't think a link would work in any case, certainly not over the nfs mount -- not unless the link location is also visible. But, I could make a copy of the tree. Our folks frequently recompile amber for this or that reason, so it really isn't feasible to put the main tree somewhere else -- if I did, they'd just copy it back. But, to copy it temporarily for a test could work.


test exe dat src/config.h src/config_amber.h

probably all of it, but may not be sufficient for amber10.

Received on Fri Apr 18 2008 - 21:15:54 PDT
Custom Search