Re: amber-developers: latest tarballs for AmberTools and Amber10

From: David A. Case <case.scripps.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:00:43 -0700

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008, Lachele Foley wrote:

> Do you want to know about the "possible test failures" even if I don't
> think the differences are very important, just so you know? Some look like
> formatting changes that might make for easy fixes. The rest are almost-same
> numbers. And, I got slightly different differences on the ia64 than on the
> i686's, if that matters.

please report formatting changes...I thought we had found all of those.
I suppose you could go ahead and post the TEST_FAILURES.diff file so we can
see round-off problems as well.
>
> ...and another minor note -- will amber be a tgz or a tar.bz2? The
> instructions are for tgz. Most of us can work that out, but it might as
> well match.

I've fixed the INSTALL file. The pdf files look ok, but please be specific
where you see problems.

...thanks...dac
Received on Fri Apr 18 2008 - 21:14:54 PDT
Custom Search