Re: amber-developers: minor (?) issues with amber10 (March 19-version)

From: Scott Brozell <sbrozell.scripps.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:56:55 -0800 (PST)

Hi,

1. is patched.
2. is patched.
3. will write a bug report and assign it to Holger;
   when is he getting a bugzilla account ?

thanks for the reports,
Scott

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, MengJuei Hsieh wrote:

> I can confirm 1) and 2) but not 3).
>
> For 1), I have a similar solution at bug44 of bugzilla.
> For 2), it's definitely something wrong in the configure_at.
>
> I am still able to run amberpdb_first_rna successfully on my Mac OS X
> leopard (ia32 g95) and fedora core 4 linux (ia32 ifort).

> From: Andreas Svrcek-Seiler <svrci.tbi.univie.ac.at>
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:45:19 +0100 (CET)
> To: <amber-developers.scripps.edu>
>
> Dear all,
> Some thigs I found while playing around with the current cvs snapshot:
> 1) Due to a recent NAB-update it is necessary to
> copy
> ${NABHOME}/src/blocksize.h
> to
> ${AMBERHOME}/src/gleap/mortsrc/nablib
>
> 2) ${AMBERHOME}/src/Makefile_at
> (cd resp && make $(G77) ) should be exchanged by
> (cd resp && make install )
> ...at least I think so.
>
> 3) The ${AMBERHOME}/test/ambpdb_first_rna test-case gives me a segfault.
> Since this segfault also occurs with an ambpdb-version compiled in 2004,
> the input file(s) -either prmtop or inpcrd might be corrupt (?).
>
Received on Fri Apr 18 2008 - 21:12:23 PDT
Custom Search