Hi Ross,
> HHHHmmm, it seems that all lam's were not created equal. I used the lam that
> ships as part of RedHat Advanced Server 4 (with g95) and this seems to be a
> non-standard 'tweaked' version of lam.
>
Are you sure?
Looking at the SRPM for RHEL4-AS:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/os/i386/SRPMS/lam-7.0.6-5.src.rpm
It suggests that the version of lam in that distro is 7.0.6, not 7.1.2:
[tmp]# rpm -qpl lam-7.0.6-5.src.rpm
lam-7.0.6.tar.bz2
lam.spec
There are no patches in that SRPM, hence I don't think it is tweaked and
the lam-7.0.6.tar.bz2 matches the md5sum of the version on the lam site,
http://www.lam-mpi.org/7.0/download.php
[]# rpm -i /tmp/lam-7.0.6-5.src.rpm
[]# pwd
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES
[]# md5sum lam-7.0.6.tar.bz2
4037133e564648bd7815e36f3f017d8b lam-7.0.6.tar.bz2
Secondly, this package (as part of the RHEL4-AS) is built with g77, not
with g95:
[root.gould-wiki SPECS]# grep BuildRequires lam.spec
BuildRequires: gcc-c++ gcc-g77 fileutils perl gcc
Is it possible that one may have installed a different RPM? Can you
check the one you have installed with rpm -qi lam ?
regards,
Mark
Received on Sun Oct 29 2006 - 06:07:20 PST
