Re: amber-developers: cvs magic

From: Mengjuei Hsieh <mengjueh.uci.edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:40:22 -0700

Hi,

I have to admit that my previous post was a little bit off-topic.

I am afraid that using subversion instead of CVS is not necessary simpler in
this scenario. The only benefit I see from svn is the speed.

I myself have svn repos with multiple mirror from CVS, I also use similar
scheme (with rsync involved) to do it.

Best, 
-- 
Mengjuei Hsieh
> From: "David A. Case" <case.scripps.edu>
> Reply-To: "amber-developers.scripps.edu" <amber-developers.scripps.edu>
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:15:05 -0700
> To: "amber-developers.scripps.edu" <amber-developers.scripps.edu>
> Subject: Re: amber-developers: cvs magic
> 
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006, Meng-Juei Hsieh wrote:
>> 
>> Well, or, you can abandon CVS and export it to a subversion repo. It's
>> supposed to be a replacement of CVS. With Trac, you can have a real
>> nice project management system.
>> 
> 
> Do you know how subversion solves this problem?   Is it fundamentally
> simpler than what Scott suggested?
> 
> ...thx...dac
>
Received on Sun Sep 10 2006 - 06:07:04 PDT
Custom Search