I'll even buy the soap. I originally refrained from saying anything
because
my blood pressure was too high.
Regards - Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Walker" <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
To: <amber-developers.scripps.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:09 PM
Subject: RE: amber-developers: Intel compiler
>> Have you guys paid attention to Intel compiler licensing terms?
>
> Indeed, this has been true for a while and is discussed on the amber
wiki
> http://amber.scripps.edu/cgi-bin/wiki.pl
>
> Although it seems that most of the academic world is oblivious to this
> restriction on the Intel compilers and since the compilers help Intel
sell
> more cpus it would seem crazy of them to try and enforce things.
Although
> numerous companies have initiated stranger attacks on their own
customers
> in
> the past...
>
> This is not too much of a problem though as g95 is now available under
the
> GNU licence and compiles Amber without problems. It's performance while
> not
> as good as ifort is inline with the performance of the g77 compiler.
>
>> Any way to turn everything back to FORTRAN 77, just in case,
>> please :)?
>
> You should go wash your mouth out with soap for suggesting such a thing
> ;-)...
>
> All the best
> Ross
>
> /\
> \/
> |\oss Walker
>
> | Department of Molecular Biology TPC15 |
> | The Scripps Research Institute |
> | Tel: +1 858 784 8889 | EMail:- ross.rosswalker.co.uk |
> | http://www.rosswalker.co.uk | PGP Key available on request |
>
> Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may
not
> be ready every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive
issues.
>
>
>
Received on Wed Apr 05 2006 - 23:49:53 PDT
