ff03ua makes sense.
Did I deposit as "ff05"? I thought I put it under the title "ff05pol".
yong
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, David A. Case wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005, Ray Luo wrote:
> >
> > >
> > 1. ff99 bond and angle terms. This set of terms has been shown in the
UA
> > paper to a deliver similar agreement to the d3lyp frequencies for a
> > tested system as the original ff99;
> > 2. ff03aa charging scheme;
> > 3. ff03aa main chain torsions;
> > 4. side chain torsions are refitted because of the new united atom
types
> > and of course new charges.
>
> Thanks! I think it should be called ff03ua. Especially since Yong
already
> has deposited an "ff05" force field that is polarizable (and hence quite
> different from yours.
>
> ...dave
>
Received on Wed Apr 05 2006 - 23:49:54 PDT
