Re: [AMBER-Developers] First release candidate for AmberTools17; git info

From: Ray Luo <>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:37:09 -0700

Hi Dave,

Just to make sure ... should we change "amber.lyx" in the
amber17-with-patches or the master branch?

All the best,

Ray Luo, Ph.D.
Professor of Structural Biology/Biochemistry/Biophysics,
Chemical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, and Chemical Engineering
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:37 AM, David Case <> wrote:
> Hi everyone:
> 1. The first release candidate for AmberTools17 is here:
>    This *should* be the same as what is in the amber17-with-patches branch
>    at  But use the tarball for testing, since that is
>    what users will actually download.
> 2. Once we are ready to release, the "update_amber --upgrade" script will
>    be functional, but this is not ready yet for testing.
> 3. You may resume making commits to the master branch at
>    You *must* email me if you want to propose any changes what will
>    be released as a part of AmberTools17.
>    **Exception**  Please to not push changes to Amber.lyx or amber.bib
>    that should not be in the AmberTools17 release.  There is still time
>    to make updates to those files that *will* be a part of the upcoming
>    release
> 4. Hai: I think you should start building the binary AmberTools releases
>    using the amber17-with-patches branch, not the master branch....thx.
> ...thx...dac
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Wed Mar 29 2017 - 14:00:02 PDT
Custom Search