Re: [AMBER-Developers] Sander parallel build broken by PBSA updates

From: Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:04:09 -0800

Ross,

Please pull again to see whether it fixed the build problem on your
side. Looks like multi-thread make does not work ... Too many
dependence issues ...

All the best,
Ray
--
Ray Luo, Ph.D.
Professor
Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
> Okay, I think I've fixed it. Don't know why the same makefile works in
> amber15 but doesn't work in amber16. I'm testing all the
> sander/pbsa/nab combs to make sure all can build without interruption
> and also pass the tests.
>
> Ray
> --
> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
> Professor
> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
>> Finally I can reproduce your problem in building the MPI sander ...
>>
>> Will get it fixed tomorrow morning ...
>>
>> Ray
>> --
>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>> Professor
>> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
>> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi Ross,
>>>
>>> Looks like that there is no extra untracked file at least in all the
>>> src folders, though there were indeed two .swp files in the test
>>> cases. So I think lack of "git clean -fdx" is not the problem. I've
>>> finished the serial build and is running "test.sander.BASIC". Looking
>>> good, so far.
>>>
>>> I'll do the MPI build next after another "git clean -fdx" ...
>>>
>>> However, I think one possible reason could be the use of multi-thread
>>> in make. There may be inter-dependent issues involved.
>>>
>>> I'll do some experiment with the MPI build to see whether this is the cause.
>>>
>>> Ray
>>> --
>>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>>> Professor
>>> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
>>> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
>>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Hi Ray,
>>>>
>>>> It's not about whether you compiled in that folder - it is whether you maybe edited files in that folder that you never committed / pushed. Try doing:
>>>>
>>>> git clean -f -d -x
>>>> git status
>>>>
>>>> And see what it reports.
>>>>
>>>> All the best
>>>> Ross
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 16, 2016, at 23:04, Ray Luo <rluo.uci.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ross,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I think my folder is clean since I have never compiled anything
>>>>> in my amber git folder. Every time after syncing with the master
>>>>> branch, I copy the whole master branch to a new folder for compiling
>>>>> and testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm about to test this evening's synced version, but will do "git
>>>>> clean -fxd" before configuring/compiling. Maybe this is why.
>>>>>
>>>>> By the way, could you add my uci email to the mailing list as well,
>>>>> i.e. "ray.luo.uci.edu"?
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best,
>>>>> Ray
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>>>>> Professor
>>>>> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
>>>>> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
>>>>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Ray,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I do this - on my OSX laptop (GCC 4.9.3), MPICH version 3.1.4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git pull
>>>>>> git clean -f -d -x
>>>>>> git status
>>>>>> On branch master
>>>>>> Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
>>>>>> nothing to commit, working directory clean
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./configure -mpi gnu
>>>>>> make install
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> dnrm2.F90:113.24:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      ASSIGN 110 TO NEXT
>>>>>>                        1
>>>>>> Warning: Deleted feature: ASSIGN statement at (1)
>>>>>> mpif90  -DBINTRAJ -DEMIL -DMPI    -c -O3 -mtune=native -fPIC  -ffree-form  -I/Users/rcw/amber/amber/include -I/Users/rcw/amber/amber/include    -o dcopy.o dcopy.F90
>>>>>> mpif90  -DBINTRAJ -DEMIL -DMPI    -c -O3 -mtune=native -fPIC  -ffree-form  -I/Users/rcw/amber/amber/include -I/Users/rcw/amber/amber/include    -o pb_force.o pb_force.F90
>>>>>> pb_force.F90:292.77:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                                   sa_init, sa_driver, sa_free, sa_free_mb,  &
>>>>>>                                                                           1
>>>>>> Error: Symbol 'saslave_init' referenced at (1) not found in module 'solvent_accessibility'
>>>>>> make[3]: *** [pb_force.o] Error 1
>>>>>> make[2]: *** [libpbsa] Error 2
>>>>>> make[1]: *** [parallel] Error 2
>>>>>> make: *** [install] Error 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same problem. Are you sure you have the latest tree and it is clean and doesn't have any modified files locally or files you forgot to add?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>> Ross
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 16, 2016, at 15:56, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Ross,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So far I can "configure -mpi gnu", "make install", and can also pass
>>>>>>> "make sander.BASIC.MPI". I'm running "make test.parallel.MM". I'm
>>>>>>> using "mpirun -np 4" for the mpi jobs. This is on Rocks 6.1/Centos
>>>>>>> 6.1. Which step was the problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However I disabled "pbsa_mbfocus" in AmberTools/test/ since I'm in the
>>>>>>> process of removing this feature to accommodate incoming CUDA. I also
>>>>>>> need to update the test cases for sander/nab/mmpbsa ... which will be
>>>>>>> partially in today for sander/nab. I'm trying to get mmpbsa.py to work
>>>>>>> with the new python environment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All the best,
>>>>>>> Ray
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>>>>>>> Professor
>>>>>>> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
>>>>>>> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
>>>>>>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Ross,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm looking into this ... There was a major overhaul of the code in
>>>>>>>> addition to new features in the last check in.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All the best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ray
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>>>>>>>> Professor
>>>>>>>> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
>>>>>>>> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
>>>>>>>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Feb 17 2016 - 17:30:03 PST
Custom Search