Hi Ross,
Looks like that there is no extra untracked file at least in all the
src folders, though there were indeed two .swp files in the test
cases. So I think lack of "git clean -fdx" is not the problem. I've
finished the serial build and is running "test.sander.BASIC". Looking
good, so far.
I'll do the MPI build next after another "git clean -fdx" ...
However, I think one possible reason could be the use of multi-thread
in make. There may be inter-dependent issues involved.
I'll do some experiment with the MPI build to see whether this is the cause.
Ray
--
Ray Luo, Ph.D.
Professor
Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> It's not about whether you compiled in that folder - it is whether you maybe edited files in that folder that you never committed / pushed. Try doing:
>
> git clean -f -d -x
> git status
>
> And see what it reports.
>
> All the best
> Ross
>
>> On Feb 16, 2016, at 23:04, Ray Luo <rluo.uci.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ross,
>>
>> Yes, I think my folder is clean since I have never compiled anything
>> in my amber git folder. Every time after syncing with the master
>> branch, I copy the whole master branch to a new folder for compiling
>> and testing.
>>
>> I'm about to test this evening's synced version, but will do "git
>> clean -fxd" before configuring/compiling. Maybe this is why.
>>
>> By the way, could you add my uci email to the mailing list as well,
>> i.e. "ray.luo.uci.edu"?
>>
>> All the best,
>> Ray
>> --
>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>> Professor
>> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
>> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Hi Ray,
>>>
>>> If I do this - on my OSX laptop (GCC 4.9.3), MPICH version 3.1.4
>>>
>>> git pull
>>> git clean -f -d -x
>>> git status
>>> On branch master
>>> Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
>>> nothing to commit, working directory clean
>>>
>>> ./configure -mpi gnu
>>> make install
>>>
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>> dnrm2.F90:113.24:
>>>
>>> ASSIGN 110 TO NEXT
>>> 1
>>> Warning: Deleted feature: ASSIGN statement at (1)
>>> mpif90 -DBINTRAJ -DEMIL -DMPI -c -O3 -mtune=native -fPIC -ffree-form -I/Users/rcw/amber/amber/include -I/Users/rcw/amber/amber/include -o dcopy.o dcopy.F90
>>> mpif90 -DBINTRAJ -DEMIL -DMPI -c -O3 -mtune=native -fPIC -ffree-form -I/Users/rcw/amber/amber/include -I/Users/rcw/amber/amber/include -o pb_force.o pb_force.F90
>>> pb_force.F90:292.77:
>>>
>>> sa_init, sa_driver, sa_free, sa_free_mb, &
>>> 1
>>> Error: Symbol 'saslave_init' referenced at (1) not found in module 'solvent_accessibility'
>>> make[3]: *** [pb_force.o] Error 1
>>> make[2]: *** [libpbsa] Error 2
>>> make[1]: *** [parallel] Error 2
>>> make: *** [install] Error 2
>>>
>>> Same problem. Are you sure you have the latest tree and it is clean and doesn't have any modified files locally or files you forgot to add?
>>>
>>> All the best
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 16, 2016, at 15:56, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ross,
>>>>
>>>> So far I can "configure -mpi gnu", "make install", and can also pass
>>>> "make sander.BASIC.MPI". I'm running "make test.parallel.MM". I'm
>>>> using "mpirun -np 4" for the mpi jobs. This is on Rocks 6.1/Centos
>>>> 6.1. Which step was the problem?
>>>>
>>>> However I disabled "pbsa_mbfocus" in AmberTools/test/ since I'm in the
>>>> process of removing this feature to accommodate incoming CUDA. I also
>>>> need to update the test cases for sander/nab/mmpbsa ... which will be
>>>> partially in today for sander/nab. I'm trying to get mmpbsa.py to work
>>>> with the new python environment.
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>> Ray
>>>> --
>>>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>>>> Professor
>>>> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
>>>> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
>>>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Ross,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm looking into this ... There was a major overhaul of the code in
>>>>> addition to new features in the last check in.
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ray
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>>>>> Professor
>>>>> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
>>>>> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
>>>>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Feb 16 2016 - 22:30:04 PST