"I'm sure she'd be happy to share her slides if she can find them and you wanted them. </throwing Lachele under the bus>"
Not that I mean to avoid being tossed under a bus, and certainly neither do I wish to cause anyone else such discomfort, but... I just looked at my slides. Are you sure you meant me? From 2015?
But, without having time to think as deeply as I would like about it (and hoping Ross will... :-), your suggestion seems ok. I suppose it could add extra steps to the calculation, but perhaps a couple lines of code to reduce the terms could fix that, too.
I thought it was there to avoid having a negative correction in the torsion terms. This is what I told some students the other day... But, I'm not convinced that will necessarily be a problem. Re-tooling all the force fields, however, could require some work.
:-) Lachele
Dr. B. Lachele Foley
Associate Research Scientist
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center
The University of Georgia
Athens, GA USA
lfoley.uga.edu
http://glycam.org
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Mon Oct 19 2015 - 18:30:03 PDT
