On Oct 13, 2014, at 5:41 PM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014, T Luchko (Lists) wrote:
>>
>>
>> -nofftw3 is there because fftw3 requires a minimum of GNU 4.3 and Intel
>> 9. It used to be that the minimum compiler version we supported was GNU
>> 4.1.2. I’d be happy to get rid of this restriction.
>
> I think we should assume compilers able to handle fftw3. I also note that
> pmemd uses -DPUBFFT even though fftw3 has been configured and is available,
> say with gnu compilers chosen. Does anyone know why this is?
>
>>
>> Inheritance is the big one for me. It would simplify my code a lot.
>
> Are you think of the "extends" keyword, or something else here? Goggling
> on "inheritance Fortran" yields a mishmash of hits, with not an obvious single
> thing being "inheritance".
Yes. The ‘extends’ keyword is what I mean. The ‘class’ keyword allows polymorphism, which I would also like, but doesn't get support until 4.5/4.6. I suspect that we will be dealing with RHEL/CentOS 6 for sometime. The cluster I had delivered in May has CentOS 6.5 on it.
Tyler
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Oct 14 2014 - 10:00:02 PDT
