Hi Dave,
I was planning to try today and see if I can clean things up a bit - in
particular greping out the RMS and Average sections from mdout since
that's where a lot of the differences appear. Once that's done we can
revisit the tolerances.
All the best
Ross
On 3/19/14, 8:30 AM, "David A Case" <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>If I run the serial cuda tests on a Tesla 2070 card with the SPFP model,
>I get 34 test diffs. To me they all look like roundoff, but I'm not happy
>with asking users to decide for themselves, without more guidance from
>the developers.
>
>Most of the SPFP tests use a relative tolerance of 1.e-4. If we changed
>that to 5.e-4, we would get rid of all but two of the test failures. Is
>this
>a reasonable thing to do? Is there another way to help users new to GPUs
>to
>interpret the test output?
>
>...thx...dac
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER-Developers mailing list
>AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Mar 19 2014 - 09:30:03 PDT
