See if you like the new tutorials index and associated css.
On 7 March 2014 11:47, Josh Berryman <the.real.josh.berryman.gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>Note that an initial goal (which is what I originally had in mind) is
> just
> >>to clean up the index page:
> >>http://ambermd.org/tutorials/index.htm
>
> OK I'll get around to it when I have a minute. As long as I have my html
> head on it should
> be fairly quick.
>
> >>If someone does decide to update the tutorials themselves, a goal should
> make
> >>them be easier to edit and update; just fixing them for the sake of w3c
> seems
> >>a low priority--content seems more important (e.g. that tutorial A4 was
> >>written for Amber8, and no longer works at all.)
>
> Well I've done B1 now. It seemed as logical a starting point as any.
> W3C compliance is the first rule of SEO, also the code is now shorter
> and considerably
> more readable (although I'm sure a pro would still scoff at it) and IMHO
> it looks better in a browser.
>
> Josh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6 March 2014 16:53, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014, Josh Berryman wrote:
>>
>> > I am having a look at the tutorials, and making an attempt to at least
>> > part-automate the conversion of obfuscated html from before the nineties
>> > into something that is not heinous and which passes w3c.
>>
>> Note that an initial goal (which is what I originally had in mind) is just
>> to clean up the index page:
>>
>> http://ambermd.org/tutorials/index.htm
>>
>> It might be necessary to re-do this one "by hand", but that would be a
>> great
>> first start. The page doesn't display correctly on Chrome (MacOSX
>> 10.9.2),
>> so I notice it, since that's the browser I generally use. (It seems to
>> be OK
>> on Safari, for example).
>>
>> If someone does decide to update the tutorials themselves, a goal should
>> make
>> them be easier to edit and update; just fixing them for the sake of w3c
>> seems
>> a low priority--content seems more important (e.g. that tutorial A4 was
>> written for Amber8, and no longer works at all.)
>>
>> ...thx...dac
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER-Developers mailing list
>> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Mar 07 2014 - 06:30:02 PST
