Thanks for the update! Yes, it turns out to be a local network issue.
It's fine on my desktop machine ...
Ray
--
Ray Luo, Ph.D.
Professor,
Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, and
Biomedical Engineering
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
> Seems to be good:
>
> 14:31:32 up 132 days, 21:44, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00
>
>
> And network checks out good. I suspect it is your end. That said a git
> pull after all these changes could be many gigabytes if you haven't
> updated for quite a while. If you are very out of date with no local
> changes it might actually quicker to do a git clone to a new directory.
>
> All the best
> Ross
>
>
> On 1/28/14, 12:32 PM, "Ray Luo, Ph.D." <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
>
>>Is it specific to our network or something wrong with the git server?
>>It's very slow to do a "git pull" ...
>>
>>Ray
>>
>>--
>>Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>>Professor,
>>Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, and
>>Biomedical Engineering
>>University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>AMBER-Developers mailing list
>>AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Jan 28 2014 - 15:00:03 PST